The Walls Are Talking, The Hearings Are Melting Down, and Power Is Starting to Panic

Washington had one of those weeks where the mask didn’t just slip — it hit the floor and shattered. Congressional hearings turned combative, witnesses grew defensive, and every new document release raised more questions than it answered. While politicians tried to run interference and media surrogates attempted distraction cycles, the public did something inconvenient: they kept paying attention. The Epstein investigations, financial ties, and political damage control are now overlapping with broader government accountability fights, and you can feel the pressure building. This isn’t a single scandal anymore. It’s a credibility crisis, and the louder officials shout “nothing to see,” the more people start looking.

Department of War Crimes

“They Closed the Sky”: Border Airspace Restrictions Raise Alarm in El Paso

The article describes a sudden federal restriction of airspace over El Paso during an immigration enforcement operation, preventing journalists, activists, and observers from documenting activity on the ground. The author argues the move limited transparency at the same time large-scale enforcement actions were taking place, fueling concern among civil-liberties advocates that immigration operations are increasingly being carried out with reduced public oversight. Officials frame such restrictions as safety and operational security measures, while critics see them as part of a broader trend of controlling information around enforcement actions at the border.

Broligarchy

Leadership Shake-Up at Musk’s xAI as Second Co-Founder Departs

Another founding executive has left Elon Musk’s artificial-intelligence company xAI, marking the second co-founder departure and raising questions about internal direction as the firm races to compete with other major AI developers. The exit comes during a period of rapid expansion, heavy investment, and ambitious promises about building advanced AI systems integrated with Musk’s broader tech ecosystem, including the X platform. While leadership changes are common in fast-moving startups, multiple early departures often signal disagreements over strategy, governance, or the pace of development in a highly competitive industry.

“Engineered Society”: Report Warns Palantir-Style Data Governance Could Reshape Public Policy

The article argues that technologies associated with Palantir — large-scale data integration, predictive analytics, and behavioral modeling — are moving beyond counterterrorism and military use into civilian government functions such as policing, welfare administration, and immigration enforcement. It suggests these systems can influence real-world decisions by flagging individuals or communities as risks based on patterns in massive datasets, potentially affecting who is investigated, monitored, or denied services. Supporters view the tools as efficient and preventative, while critics warn they may institutionalize surveillance and automated decision-making with limited transparency or appeal mechanisms.

Palantir Politics? Tech Power, Surveillance, and a Possible California Governor Run

The article explores speculation around a political figure with ties to the data-analytics company Palantir and what a gubernatorial run in California could mean for the growing relationship between technology firms and government power. It focuses on concerns that predictive analytics, data aggregation, and AI-driven decision tools — already used by law enforcement, immigration agencies, and the military — could move from policy support into policy leadership. Supporters see technological expertise as valuable for governing a complex state, while critics warn that surveillance-style governance and private-sector data practices could reshape civil liberties and public accountability.

Poll: Nearly Half of Europeans Would Support Banning Elon Musk’s X Over Legal Violations

A new European poll finds a significant share of respondents would back banning the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) if it continues violating EU digital regulations, particularly rules governing illegal content, misinformation, and moderation transparency. European regulators have been investigating whether the platform complies with the Digital Services Act, which requires large tech companies to remove unlawful material and disclose how their algorithms operate. The results suggest public opinion in parts of Europe is shifting toward stricter enforcement against major tech platforms rather than voluntary compliance.

Department of Human Health and Sacrifice

Online ID Laws Threaten Privacy and Abortion Information Access, Advocates Warn

The site argues that proposed and newly enacted online age-verification and ID-check laws — originally framed as child-safety or anti-pornography measures — are beginning to affect access to abortion information and reproductive-health resources. Because many laws require users to upload government identification before viewing certain categories of online content, reproductive-rights advocates warn that people researching pregnancy options could be logged, tracked, or exposed through data collection systems run by private verification companies. The concern is less about one website and more about a legal framework that could create a permanent digital record of who searched for abortion care.

$600 Million Cut: HIV and STD Prevention Programs Face Major Federal Funding Reduction

The administration has moved to cut roughly $600 million in federal funding dedicated to HIV and sexually transmitted disease prevention programs, affecting testing, community outreach, education, and treatment-linkage services nationwide. Public-health officials warn the programs are central to early detection and prevention efforts, especially in high-risk and underserved communities, while supporters of the cuts argue the change reflects shifting budget priorities and a restructuring of health spending. Experts caution that prevention programs often operate quietly but play a major role in controlling outbreaks, meaning reductions may not be immediately visible but could increase infection rates over time.

Department of Lack of Intelligence

Classified Intercept Sparks Whistleblower Fight After Kushner Mentioned in Foreign Intelligence Call

A classified whistleblower complaint has been filed against Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard after U.S. intelligence agencies intercepted a conversation between foreign nationals discussing Jared Kushner and issues tied in part to Iran. According to reporting, the complaint alleges the intelligence was restricted or delayed from broader distribution inside the intelligence community and instead routed through senior political channels, prompting concerns about whether national-security information was handled for political reasons. Gabbard denies wrongdoing and calls the allegations politically motivated, while lawmakers remain divided and have only seen a heavily redacted version of the complaint.

Clown Caucus

Bipartisan Senate Plan Targets Rising Utility Bills and Energy Price Spikes

A group of Democratic and Republican senators has introduced legislation aimed at limiting sharp increases in household utility bills by strengthening federal oversight of energy pricing and addressing practices that can drive sudden rate hikes. Lawmakers say the proposal would improve transparency in how electricity and gas costs are calculated and give regulators more tools to intervene when consumers face unusually high charges. The effort reflects growing political pressure from both parties as Americans confront higher heating and electricity costs, making energy affordability an emerging cross-party economic issue rather than just an environmental or regulatory debate.

House Passes SAVE Act, Igniting National Fight Over Voter Eligibility Rules

The House has passed the SAVE Act, legislation requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, setting off a major political battle over election security versus voter access. Supporters argue the measure protects against non-citizen voting and strengthens confidence in elections, while opponents warn it could disenfranchise eligible voters who lack easy access to documents like passports or birth certificates. If enacted, the policy would shift voter registration from a paperwork-light process to a documentation-heavy one, likely affecting first-time voters, married women who changed names, students, and lower-income citizens most heavily.

American Gestapo

Homeland Security Seeks Expanded Role Monitoring Social Media Posts

The report says the Trump administration is moving to expand the Department of Homeland Security’s monitoring of social media, allowing officials to more actively track online posts for potential security threats and unrest. Supporters argue the effort is aimed at identifying violence, foreign influence, and coordinated disruption earlier, while civil-liberties advocates warn the policy risks sweeping up lawful political speech and protest activity. The change would broaden how federal security agencies interpret online behavior, shifting social media from mainly an investigative tool after incidents toward a preventative surveillance role.

ICE Agents Conceal Identities as Enforcement Expands and Transparency Questions Grow

The report describes immigration enforcement officers increasingly operating with covered faces, limited identification, and minimal public accountability during raids and detentions. Critics argue the practice makes it difficult for civilians, attorneys, and watchdog groups to verify who is conducting arrests or to file misconduct complaints, especially in chaotic enforcement situations. Officials frame the measures as necessary for officer safety amid rising tensions and threats, but civil-rights advocates warn that anonymous enforcement reduces legal transparency and public oversight, particularly when arrests occur in homes, workplaces, or public spaces.

Oversight Under Threat: Watchdog Monitoring ICE Operations Is Quietly Being Dismantled

The report describes how an internal oversight system meant to investigate complaints and misconduct within Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is being weakened through budget cuts, restructuring, and reduced authority. According to the article, the office designed to receive abuse complaints, track detention conditions, and flag civil-rights violations is losing staff and independence, meaning fewer investigations and less transparency into raids, detention practices, and treatment of migrants. Critics argue this effectively removes one of the only mechanisms the public and Congress had to monitor how immigration enforcement is carried out, especially as enforcement actions expand.

Department of Injustice

Miscarriage Arrest Sparks National Outrage and Renewed Debate Over Pregnancy Criminalization

The article recounts the case of a Kentucky couple arrested after a pregnancy loss was investigated by authorities, raising fears among medical and legal advocates that miscarriages and pregnancy complications are increasingly being treated as potential criminal cases. Supporters of the investigation argue law enforcement was responding to suspected illegal conduct, while critics say the incident shows how post-Dobbs abortion laws and fetal-personhood interpretations can pull doctors, hospitals, and grieving families into police investigations even when no intentional harm occurred. The case has intensified concern among physicians and civil-rights groups that pregnancy outcomes — including natural miscarriages — may expose patients to legal risk.

Courts, Injunctions, and Money: New Legal Tactic Could Shield Policies From Challenge

The report explains a growing legal strategy in which courts require plaintiffs to post financial bonds before granting injunctions that temporarily block government policies. Republican attorneys and allies have increasingly asked judges to impose these bonds in cases challenging Trump-era actions, arguing governments and private parties suffer costs when policies are halted. Voting-rights and civil-liberties groups warn the requirement could deter lawsuits altogether, because nonprofits, activists, and individuals often cannot afford large financial guarantees just to pause a potentially unlawful policy while a case proceeds.

Judges, Climate Science, and Politics: Pressure Campaign Targets Federal Judicial Training

The report reveals that Republican lawmakers and allied groups are pressuring the Federal Judicial Center — the body that trains federal judges — over educational materials related to climate change. Critics claim the training includes biased or advocacy-oriented scientific information, while defenders argue judges need baseline scientific literacy to properly evaluate environmental cases involving pollution, regulation, and corporate liability. The dispute is less about a single seminar and more about who influences how courts understand complex scientific evidence, as climate litigation increasingly reaches federal courts.

Voting Rights Fight Intensifies as Felon Disenfranchisement Returns to the Courts

The article argues that new legal and political battles are emerging over whether Americans with felony convictions can realistically regain the right to vote, focusing on how state rules, fines, and administrative barriers effectively block restoration even after sentences are completed. It frames the issue as a core democracy question rather than a niche legal matter: millions of citizens may technically have voting rights on paper but face confusing eligibility rules, financial requirements, or prosecution risks if they guess wrong. The broader concern is that voting access is increasingly being decided not just by elections, but by courts, bureaucratic procedures, and enforcement discretion.

Pedo von Schitzenpantz

Canada Bridge Deal Draws Scrutiny Over Business Ties to Trump-Linked Figures

Reporting examines a Canadian infrastructure transaction involving the owner of a major international bridge and connections to business figures tied to Donald Trump’s political and financial network, including Commerce-related associates. The story focuses on how cross-border infrastructure — a critical trade corridor between the U.S. and Canada — intersects with private investment, lobbying, and political relationships. While no single illegal act is alleged, the concern centers on potential conflicts of interest when individuals connected to government policy also have financial stakes in assets affected by trade, tariffs, and regulatory decisions.

Timeline Details Web of Ties Linking UAE, Crypto Giant Binance, and Trump-Era Political Circles

The article lays out a chronological timeline connecting business dealings, foreign investment interests, and political relationships involving figures tied to the United Arab Emirates, the cryptocurrency exchange Binance, and individuals within Trump-aligned networks. Rather than alleging a single illegal act, the reporting focuses on overlapping financial partnerships, advisory roles, and diplomatic relationships that developed alongside regulatory decisions affecting crypto and international finance. The central argument is that the story reflects the growing intersection of geopolitics, digital finance, and political influence — where business ventures, foreign policy relationships, and regulatory power increasingly operate in the same sphere.

Environmental Powers Targeted: EPA Authority Over Climate and Pollution Faces Major Rollback

The article reports that a new policy move would strip or sharply limit the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate certain emissions and environmental standards, shifting decision-making power away from federal regulators and toward states and industry. Supporters frame it as reducing federal overreach and regulatory burden, while critics warn it weakens air, water, and climate protections that currently apply nationwide. The broader impact is that environmental policy could become fragmented — with protections varying widely by state — and future pollution or climate rules potentially harder for any administration to enforce.

Where Did the Money Go? Questions Grow Over Missing Trump-Era Stimulus Payments

The article examines complaints from Americans who say they never received pandemic-era stimulus payments they were eligible for, and the bureaucratic confusion that followed. It argues that administrative errors, tax-filing complications, and shifting eligibility guidance left some households navigating a maze of IRS processes to claim funds years later. The broader political point is that relief programs don’t just succeed or fail based on legislation — they depend on execution, and gaps in implementation can quietly leave vulnerable people without aid while officials publicly claim success.

Georgia Probe Heats Up: New Fallout From Trump-Related Fulton County Raid

The article details escalating legal and political repercussions tied to a Fulton County, Georgia investigation connected to Donald Trump and his allies, focusing on a controversial raid and the broader effort to examine attempts to interfere with election administration. Prosecutors are portrayed as widening the scope beyond a single incident toward a coordinated pressure campaign targeting local officials, while Trump-aligned figures frame the investigation as political retaliation. The situation underscores that the legal battles surrounding the 2020 election aftermath are still active and potentially expanding, with real criminal exposure for participants depending on how conspiracy and obstruction evidence is interpreted.

DHS Funding Crisis Sparks Shutdown Fears as Immigration and Border Battles Escalate

The article reports that the Department of Homeland Security is approaching a funding deadline, raising the possibility that key immigration, border, and enforcement operations could be disrupted if Congress fails to act. The dispute centers on political fights over border policy and enforcement priorities, with lawmakers using DHS funding as leverage in broader immigration negotiations. The potential shortfall threatens agencies ranging from FEMA to TSA and ICE, creating uncertainty about staffing, detention operations, disaster response readiness, and airport security while negotiations stall in Washington.

The Epstein Class

Epstein Fallout Widens as Lawsuits, Documents, and Political Pressure Accelerate

The latest developments show the Jeffrey Epstein investigation continuing to expand across courts, governments, and institutions as new documents, lawsuits, and disclosures surface. Recent reporting highlights banks facing legal exposure, additional high-profile associations being scrutinized, and ongoing political controversy surrounding document releases and testimony. Rather than fading, the case is evolving into a broader accountability process examining not only Epstein’s crimes but also the financial, social, and institutional networks that enabled his activities and protected his access for years.

Inside the White House: The Adviser Shaping Trump’s Most Controversial Decisions

The article examines a senior presidential aide described as playing a major role in influencing Donald Trump’s policy direction and rhetoric, particularly on hard-line immigration, national identity, and executive authority issues. It portrays the relationship as unusually close, with the adviser helping translate Trump’s instincts into concrete policy actions and messaging strategy. Rather than focusing only on the president’s personality, the piece argues that understanding who surrounds a president — and who frames information for them — is essential to understanding how controversial policies actually emerge and get implemented.

Resistance Kitty says “Statistically… this is getting awkward.”

The Resistance

Watchdog Files Complaint Seeking Preservation of Trump’s Deleted Truth Social Posts

The ethics organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has filed a legal complaint arguing the White House and the National Archives must preserve deleted posts from Donald Trump’s Truth Social account under federal records laws. The group contends that presidential communications — including social media — may qualify as official records and therefore cannot be erased without archiving. The dispute centers on whether modern digital platforms function as official government communication channels and whether deletion could violate presidential records preservation requirements.

Canadian Lawmaker Warns: Armored Vehicle Sales Risk Fueling Human Rights Abuses

A Canadian member of parliament is urging the government to halt the export of armored vehicles to foreign governments, arguing the equipment could be used to suppress civilians and protesters rather than legitimate security threats. The article frames the issue as part of a broader global pattern — democratic countries supplying policing and military tools that later appear in crackdowns, occupations, and civil-rights violations. The warning reflects growing concern among Western lawmakers that security partnerships and defense contracts are increasingly colliding with human rights obligations, especially as governments worldwide adopt more aggressive internal security tactics.

Impeachment Calls Target DHS Leadership as Immigration Powers and Enforcement Expand

The article calls for the impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, arguing recent immigration enforcement policies and operational tactics represent an abuse of authority and a threat to civil liberties. It centers on aggressive enforcement actions, expanded detention practices, and reduced oversight mechanisms, framing them as part of a broader shift toward harder federal immigration control. Supporters of the administration describe the policies as necessary border security, while critics view them as politically driven and legally questionable, setting up a widening confrontation between immigration policy, executive power, and congressional accountability.

What We Are Watching Today

President Trump Remarks to Fort Bragg Military Families

Featured Resisters

Today’s Call to Action

Special Call to Action — Request a Legal Ethics Review on Pam Bondi

Attorneys are not regulated by elections or public opinion. They are regulated by professional ethics rules. When a lawyer holding public power may have violated duties of honesty, candor, or conflicts-of-interest standards, citizens have a lawful mechanism: a bar complaint requesting review. You are not accusing anyone of a crime. You are requesting an ethics investigation — which the bar is legally required to review. Take 3 minutes and submit a professional conduct review request regarding attorney Pam Bondi.

Step 1 — Copy and Send This Complaint

To Whom It May Concern,

I am submitting a request for review and investigation regarding the professional conduct of attorney Pam Bondi.

Based on public statements, sworn testimony, and documented conduct related to matters involving the Jeffrey Epstein investigations and related proceedings, there are concerns that Ms. Bondi may have violated rules of professional responsibility governing attorney honesty, candor, and conflicts of interest.

I respectfully request the Bar evaluate whether her actions meet potential violations involving:
• Candor toward tribunals and the public
• Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
• Misrepresentation of material facts in official proceedings
• Possible conflicts of interest or appearance of impropriety

Because attorneys hold a protected public trust, allegations involving misleading testimony or interference with accountability processes warrant independent professional review. I am not requesting a political determination; I am requesting an ethics review consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Please confirm receipt of this complaint and advise whether additional documentation should be submitted.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City/State]
[Email or Phone]

Step 2 — Where to Send It

Florida Bar — primary licensing authority (most important)
Submit online through the Attorney Consumer Assistance Program:
https://www.floridabar.org/public/acap/

Phone: 866-352-0707

Mailing address:
Attorney Consumer Assistance Program (ACAP)
The Florida Bar
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

Washington State Bar Association complaint intake:
https://www.wsba.org/for-the-public/concerns-about-a-lawyer

Email: intake@wsba.org
Phone: 800-945-9722

American Bar Association (national ethics review and referrals):
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/resources/resources_for_the_public/

General contact:
https://www.americanbar.org/contact/

Call your lawmakers

Read Today’s Resistance Survival Guide

Resistance Survival Guide #201 — How to Recognize Online Manipulation, Bots, and Infiltrators in Local Groups

Send and Share These Pre Written Letters

Sign and Share These Petitions

Let’s Roll!

Here’s the important part: scandals only matter if citizens refuse to let them fade. Political power survives on public exhaustion. They wait for outrage to burn out, for people to get busy, and for the next news cycle to replace accountability. Don’t give them that relief. Share verified information. Contact your representatives. Support investigative journalists. Attend local meetings and ask direct questions. History doesn’t turn because leaders suddenly become ethical — it turns because ordinary people stay stubbornly engaged. Today’s job is simple: stay informed, stay loud, and keep the pressure on until answers exist, not just talking points.

R – Respect Existence Or Expect Resistance White And Black Outlined Dark Style Unisex T-shirt